Programmer Competency Matrix Checklist

This checklist is stored in your browser localstorage while you are not logged in.

  2n (Level 0) n2 (Level 1) n (Level 2) log(n) (Level 3)
languages with professional experience
Imperative or Object Oriented
Imperative, Object-Oriented and declarative (SQL), added bonus if they understand static vs dynamic typing, weak vs strong typing and static inferred types
Functional, added bonus if they understand lazy evaluation, currying, continuations
Concurrent (Erlang, Oz) and Logic (Prolog)
platforms with professional experience
1
2-3
4-5
6+
years of professional experience
1
2-5
6-9
10+
domain knowledge
No knowledge of the domain
Has worked on at least one product in the domain.
Has worked on multiple products in the same domain.
Domain expert. Has designed and implemented several products/solutions in the domain. Well versed with standard terms, protocols used in the domain.
  2n (Level 0) n2 (Level 1) n (Level 2) log(n) (Level 3)
tool knowledge
Limited to primary IDE (VS.Net, Eclipse etc.)
Good knowledge of editors, debuggers, IDEs, open source alternatives etc. etc. For e.g. someone who knows most of the tools from Scott Hanselman's power tools list. Has used ORM tools.
Has actually written tools and scripts, added bonus if they've been published.
languages exposed to
Imperative or Object Oriented
Imperative, Object-Oriented and declarative (SQL), added bonus if they understand static vs dynamic typing, weak vs strong typing and static inferred types
Functional, added bonus if they understand lazy evaluation, currying, continuations
Concurrent (Erlang, Oz) and Logic (Prolog)
codebase knowledge
Has never looked at the codebase
Basic knowledge of the code layout and how to build the system
Good working knowledge of code base, has implemented several bug fixes and maybe some small features.
Has implemented multiple big features in the codebase and can easily visualize the changes required for most features or bug fixes.
knowledge of upcoming technologies
Has not heard of the upcoming technologies
Has heard of upcoming technologies in the field
Has downloaded the alpha preview/CTP/beta and read some articles/manuals
Has played with the previews and has actually built something with it and as a bonus shared that with everyone else
platform internals
Zero knowledge of platform internals
Has basic knowledge of how the platform works internally
Deep knowledge of platform internals and can visualize how the platform takes the program and converts it into executable code.
Has written tools to enhance or provide information on platform internals. For e.g. disassemblers, decompilers, debuggers etc.
books
Unleashed series, 21 days series, 24 hour series, dummies series...
Code Complete, Don't Make me Think, Mastering Regular Expressions
Design Patterns, Peopleware, Programming Pearls, Algorithm Design Manual, Pragmatic Programmer, Mythical Man month
Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, Concepts Techniques, Models of Computer Programming, Art of Computer Programming, Database systems , by C. J Date, Thinking Forth, Little Schemer
blogs
Has heard of them but never got the time.
Reads tech/programming/software engineering blogs and listens to podcasts regularly.
Maintains a blog in which personal insights and thoughts on programming are shared
  2n (Level 0) n2 (Level 1) n (Level 2) log(n) (Level 3)
problem decomposition
Only straight line code with copy paste for reuse
Able to break up problem into multiple functions
Able to come up with reusable functions/objects that solve the overall problem
Use of appropriate data structures and algorithms and comes up with generic/object-oriented code that encapsulate aspects of the problem that are subject to change.
systems decomposition
Not able to think above the level of a single file/class
Able to break up problem space and design solution as long as it is within the same platform/technology
Able to design systems that span multiple technologies/platforms.
Able to visualize and design complex systems with multiple product lines and integrations with external systems. Also should be able to design operations support systems like monitoring, reporting, fail overs etc.
communication
Cannot express thoughts/ideas to peers. Poor spelling and grammar.
Peers can understand what is being said. Good spelling and grammar.
Is able to effectively communicate with peers
Able to understand and communicate thoughts/design/ideas/specs in a unambiguous manner and adjusts communication as per the context
code organization within a file
no evidence of organization within a file
Methods are grouped logically or by accessibility
Code is grouped into regions and well commented with references to other source files
File has license header, summary, well commented, consistent white space usage. The file should look beautiful.
code organization across files
No thought given to organizing code across files
Related files are grouped into a folder
Each physical file has a unique purpose, for e.g. one class definition, one feature implementation etc.
Code organization at a physical level closely matches design and looking at file names and folder distribution provides insights into design
source tree organization
Everything in one folder
Basic separation of code into logical folders.
No circular dependencies, binaries, libs, docs, builds, third-party code all organized into appropriate folders
Physical layout of source tree matches logical hierarchy and organization. The directory names and organization provide insights into the design of the system.
code readability
Mono-syllable names
Good names for files, variables classes, methods etc.
No long functions, comments explaining unusual code, bug fixes, code assumptions
Code assumptions are verified using asserts, code flows naturally - no deep nesting of conditionals or methods
defensive coding
Doesn't understand the concept
Checks all arguments and asserts critical assumptions in code
Makes sure to check return values and check for exceptions around code that can fail.
Has his own library to help with defensive coding, writes unit tests that simulate faults
error handling
Only codes the happy case
Basic error handling around code that can throw exceptions/generate errors
Ensures that error/exceptions leave program in good state, resources, connections and memory is all cleaned up properly
Codes to detect possible exception before, maintain consistent exception handling strategy in all layers of code, come up with guidelines on exception handling for entire system.
IDE
Mostly uses IDE for text editing
Knows their way around the interface, able to effectively use the IDE using menus.
Knows keyboard shortcuts for most used operations.
Has written custom macros
API
Needs to look up the documentation frequently
Has the most frequently used APIs in memory
Vast and In-depth knowledge of the API
Has written libraries that sit on top of the API to simplify frequently used tasks and to fill in gaps in the API
frameworks
Has not used any framework outside of the core platform
Has used more than one framework in a professional capacity and is well-versed with the idioms of the frameworks.
Author of framework
requirements
Takes the given requirements and codes to spec
Come up with questions regarding missed cases in the spec
Understand complete picture and come up with entire areas that need to be speced
Able to suggest better alternatives and flows to given requirements based on experience
scripting
No knowledge of scripting tools
Batch files/shell scripts
Perl/Python/Ruby/VBScript/Powershell
Has written and published reusable code
database
Thinks that Excel is a database
Knows basic database concepts, normalization, ACID, transactions and can write simple selects
Able to design good and normalized database schemas keeping in mind the queries that'll have to be run, proficient in use of views, stored procedures, triggers and user defined types. Knows difference between clustered and non-clustered indexes. Proficient in use of ORM tools.
Can do basic database administration, performance optimization, index optimization, write advanced select queries, able to replace cursor usage with relational sql, understands how data is stored internally, understands how indexes are stored internally, understands how databases can be mirrored, replicated etc. Understands how the two phase commit works.
  2n (Level 0) n2 (Level 1) n (Level 2) log(n) (Level 3)
source code version control
Folder backups by date
VSS and beginning CVS/SVN user
Proficient in using CVS and SVN features. Knows how to branch and merge, use patches setup repository properties etc.
Knowledge of distributed VCS systems. Has tried out Bzr/Mercurial/Darcs/Git
build automation
Only knows how to build from IDE
Knows how to build the system from the command line
Can setup a script to build the basic system
Can setup a script to build the system and also documentation, installers, generate release notes and tag the code in source control
automated testing
Thinks that all testing is the job of the tester
Has written automated unit tests and comes up with good unit test cases for the code that is being written
Has written code in TDD manner
Understands and is able to setup automated functional, load/performance and UI tests
  2n (Level 0) n2 (Level 1) n (Level 2) log(n) (Level 3)
data structures
Doesn't know the difference between Array and LinkedList
Able to explain and use Arrays, LinkedLists, Dictionaries etc in practical programming tasks
Knows space and time tradeoffs of the basic data structures, Arrays vs LinkedLists, Able to explain how hashtables can be implemented and can handle collisions, Priority queues and ways to implement them etc.
Knowledge of advanced data structures like B-trees, binomial and fibonacci heaps, AVL/Red Black trees, Splay Trees, Skip Lists, tries etc.
algorithms
Unable to find the average of numbers in an array (It's hard to believe but I've interviewed such candidates)
Basic sorting, searching and data structure traversal and retrieval algorithms
Tree, Graph, simple greedy and divide and conquer algorithms, is able to understand the relevance of the levels of this matrix.
Able to recognize and code dynamic programming solutions, good knowledge of graph algorithms, good knowledge of numerical computation algorithms, able to identify NP problems etc.
systems programming
Doesn't know what a compiler, linker or interpreter is
Basic understanding of compilers, linker and interpreters. Understands what assembly code is and how things work at the hardware level. Some knowledge of virtual memory and paging.
Understands kernel mode vs. user mode, multi-threading, synchronization primitives and how they're implemented, able to read assembly code. Understands how networks work, understanding of network protocols and socket level programming.
Understands the entire programming stack, hardware (CPU + Memory + Cache + Interrupts + microcode), binary code, assembly, static and dynamic linking, compilation, interpretation, JIT compilation, garbage collection, heap, stack, memory addressing...

This page is inspired by Programmer Competency Matrix (indiangeek)

Check out the source code at Github: https://github.com/hltbra/programmer-competency-checklist